|

Most of the following Hit List items are lessons learned at the receiving end of
a Nonconformity note. We have either received a formal corrective action from
an external ISO auditor or that auditor has specifically pointed out the
importance. Of course different auditors will see different things but you can
bet that the most particular of those auditors will know and/or live by the
content of mental lists similar to this one.
-
There must be an assessment of your training needs. Once completed it will give
you a plan of action for a training program. (Clause 6.2.2 a)
-
Job descriptions must be current for everyone in the company. When the ISO
Auditor mentions all job descriptions for employees performing a quality
function, they mean everyone (Clause 6.2.2 a).
-
Are all employees qualified to perform their function? If so, a document must
evidence this fact, and the company must be able to prove it (Clause 6.2.2 e).
You might already be doing this with regular performance reviews.
-
In order to prevent regression and to promote continuous improvement, an
internal audit program must be established. You must develop an audit plan that
is maintained and implemented internally (Clause 8.2.2).
-
When conditions are found to be insufficiently defined or are out of control,
they will need to be defined or brought into control (Clause 7.5.1).
Individuals that work on these types of processes need to be empowered to make
the changes and write corrective action requests (CAR's). (Clause 6.4 & 8.5.2)
-
There are six mandatory procedures identified by the Standard; however, other
written procedures may be needed if conditions are found that a process has not
been established by other means of communication (i.e., verbal) (4.2.1 d). The
Auditor will ask two or three people about a process and if the answer is not
identical from each, a nonconformance is likely to result.
-
If a document states a time frame for action, the action must be accomplished
within that time or a CAR will be written. For example, when design decision
documents by Design Engineers must be kept permanently, you should be able to
show all design decision documents. Or, if an action in a CAR must be completed
by February 14 and it's still open on March 15 without a written explanation or
extension, the Auditor will issue your company a nonconformance. (an internal
non-compliance with organization’s procedures) (Clause 4.2.1 d)
-
Management (i.e. the President, CEO or the management representative) must
create top-management review records (agenda & minutes) on the effectiveness of
the company's quality program system (Clause 5.6). This means each person or
department should provide him/her with a report on the status of that
department. For example, Order Processing spends an average of 45 minutes per
order due to options that need to be clarified by the customer. The CEO will
then assign two people to evaluate and make a recommendation within 2 weeks.
Wasted time is wasted profits and in today's competitive industry this cannot
be allowed.
-
If disposition of nonconformances requires authorization then the authorized
person must be identified. (Clause 8.3)
-
Purchase orders (PO's) or equivalent must be reviewed to ensure that purchased
product conforms to requirements prior to the supplier getting the order. This
means that before the PO is mailed to the supplier it must be reviewed by a
cognizant individual to verify drawing revision(s) and any special materiel
requirements (i.e. swasey or tests). The PO should then be signed and dated.
You must provide evidence that you have control of this process (Clause 7.4.1)
-
You must provide proof (records) that you have evaluated suppliers based on
their ability to meet your requirements. You must establish criteria for
selecting, evaluating and re-revaluating suppliers. Also these records must be
kept according to your record retention requirements (Clause 7.4.1)
-
There must be a program in place that monitors the calibration and maintenance
of test equipment by a certified standard or agency. The calibration standards
must be traceable to an industry-recognized standard or where a standard does
not exist, you will need to establish a basis for calibration and keep records
of verification (Clause 7.6 a).
-
Statistical techniques may be included where it is determined applicable for an
opportunity for improvement. For example, the time to process an order, rework,
or wrong product supplied (options or descriptions) (Clause 8.1 & 8.4).
-
There must be records/evidence of design input (sales, customer, marketing) and
design output (engineering) and verification that the criteria were met. Use a
form for design release similar to that of design specification - meaning most
of the same signatures required (Clause 7.3.1).
-
Required procedures and records must be under control (4.2.3 & 4.2.4).
-
Industry Codes and Standards (i.e. ANSI, NEMA, and ISO) are treated by the
Standard as documents of external origin and must be controlled. (Clause 4.2.3
f).
-
There must be evidence that effective processes are in place to collect and
analyze customer complaints, customer perception, and satisfaction (Clauses
7.2.3 c, 8.5.2, 8.2.1, 8.4 a, 5.2, and 6.1).
-
When changes are made to customer orders and related documents, it must be
recorded (records) (Clause 7.2.2 b).
-
There must be records/evidence of contract review and approval of the customers
order before it is sent to Production, Operations, or Manufacturing (Clause
7.2.2).
-
Controlled documents may not exist in an outdated status within any area that
uses those documents (Clause 4.2.3 c).
-
Controlled documents may not be altered, even by personal notes, without proper
procedural allowances such as being redlined, signed and dated Clause 4.2.3).
-
All materiel subject to quality inspection or test must show evidence of
inspection or test (Clause 8.2.4).
-
Materiel that deteriorates or has a limited life must be under shelf-life
control. A few examples of this materiel would be labels, adhesives, epoxies,
solutions, and o-rings (Clause 7.5.5).
-
All quality management system (QMS) documents must be referenced in the quality
manual (4.2.2).
-
Top management must provide evidence/records (quality policy, management
review, etc.) of their commitment in developing, implementing and improving the
effectiveness of the quality management system (QMS) (Clause 5.1).
|
|